Since the late 1970s, the Boy Scouts of America (B.S.A.) has had a policy that bans gay youth and adult leaders from membership in the Boy Scouts. In 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that B.S.A. had the legal right to continue this discriminatory policy. In the years since, organizations have been formed to fight the ban through other channels.
Meanwhile, B.S.A. has ejected Scouts and adult leaders whose homosexuality came its attention. Others, after becoming aware of the policy, left Scouting on their own. Untold numbers have declined to get involved at all.
More than 60% of volunteer Scouting leaders voted on Thursday, May 23, to partially lift the ban, but only to the extent that it covers youth Scouting members; under the proposed change, gay adult leaders will still be banned.
Will it now be safe for gay Scouts to come out? What message does the partial change send? Will it be enough to enable B.S.A. to regain some of the support and membership it has lost? Perhaps most importantly, why is the B.S.A. reluctant to make a sweeping statement that discrimination is simply wrong?
This week's edition of OutCasting, which was produced before the vote took place, explores these complex issues through discussions with people who are or have been involved with the fight to overturn the ban, including:
This program was broadcast nationally on the Pacifica Radio Network.
On May 8, 2014, nearly a year after the Boy Scouts of America voted to partially lift its gay ban, The New York Times published an article concluding, not unpredictably, that the partial change was "promoted as a compromise intended to offer the organization time to figure out how to proceed. Instead, it has brought the Scouts only more ire from all directions and produced a house divided."